Below are some
of Ed Meyertholen’s comments and answers to specific questions concerning
CRISPR and iRNA research. To read the entire forum discussion, follow this
link: http://www.kennedysdisease.org/index.php/provide-support/chat-room-transcripts/2016-chat-room-transcripts/627-2016-february-06
.
“I am not a
CRISPR expert, but the technique has been quickly (in the science view of
quickly - several years) improving and it is expected that it will continue to
do so. I do not think we will see this in humans for a while (years).
In KD, I can
imagine there may be issues on specificity - what cells to send CRISPR to,
nerve cells or muscle (or both) and then one has to develop the procedures to
specify the cells. The CRISPR work is very new and I do not know if anyone is
working on it in Kennedy’s Disease. I suspect that someone will be soon. Nonetheless,
I think that it has great possibilities - and I am usually not too optimistic.
What happens
is that they use a virus that normally attacks a specific cell type (like
muscle), remove the DNA from the virus and replace it with the DNA needed to
get CRISRP to work. The virus with the CRISPR DNA in injected into blood, goes
to the muscle cells and instead of injecting viral (bad) DNA, injects the
CRISPR DNA. The CRISPR DNA then lets the muscle cells make the CRISPR proteins
which then should (and in the mouse, did) alter the DNA in those cells only. DNA
in other than muscle cells is not affected.
Kennedy’s
Disease may give rise to other issues - the androgen receptor (the mutated
protein) is made in many cells and may have effects (sexual issues, gynomatica
(sp)), so we might want to alter the gene in other cells as well. It has great
possibilities but it is not ready for prime time yet. This is the CRISPR paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721684.
There was
another paper from NIH (Kurt's lab) where they used iRNA to block the synthesis
of the mutant androgen receptor and found that the mice got better. This is
similar to work from LaSpada and from Lieberman that had been published a few
years ago. These were done in conjunction with drug companies and I would not
be surprised if there would be a clinical trial (I think that there is one
starting using the same technique in Huntington's Disease) now. The other
techniques with iRNA or ISO's are much closer to clinical use. If I remember
correctly getting to nerve cells requires getting past the blood-brain barrier
issue(s). Kurt's paper is here - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26755334
.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment. By taking a moment to share your thoughts you add much to these articles. The articles then become more than just something I said or believe. In addition, by adding a comment, you might just be helping the next reader by sharing your opinion, experience, or a helpful tip. You can comment below or by sending me an email. I look forward to hearing from you.